Wow. I just realized that I missed a month.
I went to my gyn onc appointment and had a quick exam. Everything had been healing well and I was only having a little bladder pain during the exam. She then discussed what she found in surgery. My tumor was, of-course- unusual. Again another reason why my outcome is completely unpredictable. The tumor itself was lightly attached to my bladder and so she didn't have to removed much bladder tissue and muscle. It was also still encapsulated- meaning that the malignant tissue was completely enclosed in normal tissue- something that was completely unexpected. Because of this all fluid washes and other biopsies were negative. Altogether the surgery went very well. Some of the malignant tissue was sent to pathology for future testing.
We then talked about the next step. I had a lot to say and a ton of questions after attending the OC Symposium a few months ago- mainly on new treatments and monitoring measures. After all my reservations about chemotherapy, we agreed that it would be the best option. Why did I change my mind? People may think it's a silly reason, but the new drugs wouldn't cause me to lose my hair. This is a little-talked about concern in cancer research, but really should be addressed. Hair is everything. I'm not one to always care about my appearance- evident by passing on makeup, nice clothes, etc- but losing my hair was just an experience that I don't want to repeat. It's so weird being bald with no eyebrows or lashes. I didn't feel like a woman- more like an undesirable alien life form. I know that this goes against previous posts and the title of this blog, but I don't care. It was ok the first time but now...
The chemo drugs that we discussed were using carboplatin again, with possibly
Doxorubicin or Avastin. However, there are many factors that will determine which drug to use. To start, it is unclear whether this tumor was considered platinum drug resistant. Drug-resistance is defined as whether there is a relapse-free interval longer than 6 months. Considering that my tumor was undiscovered until last summer & possibly felt on follow-up examinations prior to that, my interval is unclear. Therefore it's hard to tell whether my prolonged Carboplatin therapy was actually effective.
As a side note: my doctor also mentioned that the bladder area had received significantly less radiation than the rest of my abdomen. Most of the beams were focused on my para-aortic nodes, because this was were the cancer had spread. All of this means that radiation may have been effective because there was no evidence of cancer in that area.
The tissue that was sent to pathology, was apparently being tested for drug sensitivity. I provided a link an article about this on my 11/19/10 post. This is a new method of treatment- offering patients more personalized treatment based on actually cell studies. I was excited to find that this was an option for me. Unfortunately, at the time of my appointment, my tumor cells had not grown to a sufficient size to begin testing. Even now, 6 weeks later, the damn tumor is so slow-growing that the lab hasn't contacted my doctor with the results. This really makes a case that the tumor was present much earlier than diagnosed. It also means that I will not start treatment until we have these results. However, because the tumor is growing so slowly, there is really no rush to start empirical treatment with the past-drug regimen.
Another thing we discussed was the CA-125 test. Clearly I could no longer rely on this test because my values had been normal despite having a recurrence. So how else could I monitor the effectiveness of treatment? My doctor said really the only way was more CT scans, but this time every 6 months.
At the end of the visit I asked about outcomes. Already knowing the answer, I asked her whether my cancer will be a chronic problem for me. Most-likely yes. She said that due to the kind of cancer (clear cell) it was pretty likely that it would recur. I asked about what then and about more surgeries, and she said that with my good health that could always be an option. She did offer some hope though: everything about my cancer- age of diagnosis, odd spread pattern, clear cell type, and the characteristics of the new tumor (encapsulation & it's slow-growth) - made my case completely unpredictable. She did say that she still had hope for a cure. With all the new research, scientists are coming closer and closer to developing a cure. Most drugs would probably become available to patients in the next five years, and she was hopeful that I would still be around by then. It may be five years of frustration, but five years I can hopefully remain strong and deal with
